1985 (6) TMI 188

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DR, for the Appellants. Shri A.K.S. Bedi, Advocate, for the Respondents. ORDER This appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order dated 18-4-1984 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. By the said order, the learned Collector (Appeals) has allowed to the respondents the benefit of the deduction of freight element for movement of the goods from the factory....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Act. We have again read our order passed in the case of Kunal Engineering Co. referred to by the JDR. We observe that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in their judgment 1983 E.L.T. 1896 (S.C.) (Union of India & Ors. v. Bombay Tyre International Pvt. Ltd. etc.) have already held that freight whether equalised or actual would be an admissible deduction for arriving at the assessable value of excisable good....