Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2014 (12) TMI 467

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fer Pricing)-IV, Pune (TPO) u/s 92CA of the ITA, 1961 for determining the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of the appellant's International Transactions; without forming any opinion as envisaged u/s 92C(3) of the ITA, 1961. 2. The Hon'ble Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) erred in law and on facts in sustaining addition of Rs. 96,49,504/- to the appellant's income on account of transaction of sale of finished goods to the AE parties; as so proposed by the TPO vide order u/s 92CA(3) of the ITA, 1961. 3. The Hon'ble DRP, TPO and AO erred on facts in not appreciating the appellant's requests for benchmarking sales transactions to the AE parties, under various alternate approaches as follows : - Comparison of Transaction-by-Transaction sales rate - Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ated enterprises. Company made Total export sale of 15,69,025 kgs. of stitched bond fabric for Rs. 15,60,27,886/- to AE and 344,295 kgs for Rs. 3,67,22,755/- to non-Associated Enterprises. The company decided the prices of sales of stitched bond fabric on a transaction to transaction basis. The reasons for different prices at different times are factors such as petroleum price, yarn price, glass price, etc. on a global basis. 4. A.Y. 2007-08 was first year of operations of the Company and company required strong support from the associated companies to achieve the volume and use of the capacity. During the bench marking process, in order to compare the price at which goods are sold to Associates Enterprises and Non Associated Enterprises, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P approach, same period transactions ought to be compared so that correct benchmarking takes place. The Learned Assessee's Representative submitted that as per working on Page-71 of the Paper-Book, export sales rates in the month of March-2007 have increased drastically. It was submitted, for a correct benchmarking, transactions of March-2007 ought to have been ignored. Similar situation arose in February-2007 (in particular after 2-2-2007) and hence, sales to non-Associated Enterprises after 2-2-2007 should have been ignored. It is also submitted that this aspect has not been considered by the I-T authorities despite specific attention being invited vide written submission and vide oral arguments during the proceedings. B)Adjustments soug....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d for Associated Enterprises and non-Associate Enterprise parties separately and chronologically. A perusal of the said workings reveals that the rates charged by the assessee company to the Associated Enterprises party vis-à-vis non-Associated Enterprises party were in close range. In fact, in many situations, the Associated Enterprise rates were slightly more / higher than the non-Associated Enterprises rates. The said bill-wise working was also supported with month-wise averages. The following situation prevails on a month-wise average basis working. Month Average rate charged to AE party (Rs. per KG) Average rate charged to non-AE party (Rs. per KG) April-06 No supply No supply May-06 No supply No supply June-06 No sup....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e by the appellant before the DRP wherein, it was explained that, if the benchmarking is done transaction-by-transaction, no additions are warranted and so on. In this regard, we have observed the OECD commentary put forth by the learned Assessee's Representative and the relevant Para of the OECD commentary reads as under. A.3.1 Evaluation of a taxpayer's separate and combined transactions 3.9 Ideally, in order to arrive at the most precise approximation of arm's length conditions, the arm's length principle should be applied on a transaction-by-transaction basis. However, there are often situations where separate transactions are so closely linked or continuous that they cannot be evaluated adequately on a separate basis. Examples ma....