Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (12) TMI 394

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1986-1987, petitioner filed return of income declaring the total income of Rs. 24,970/-, when assessment was completed under section 143(1) of the Act on 27.7.1987. During the assessment proceedings, 1990-1991, the Assessing Officer noticed that there was outstanding loan of Rs. 18,50,000/- from one M/s Vardhman Trading Company, after the payment of Rs. 3,00,000/- outstanding balance on 31.3.1990 was shown as Rs. 5,55,000/- and M/s Vardhman Trading Company did not show the petitioner as its debtors in its balance sheet, the Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under section 148 of the Act against the petitioner. The Assessing Authority did not accept the identity or capacity of the creditor and the genuineness of the transaction, accordi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aph 3.5 of the order, which is as follows: " 3.5 We have also considered, various cases which have been relied upon by the ld. Counsel. It emerges that the assessee is obliged to file evidence regarding the identity and creditworthiness of the lender and genuineness of the transaction. The evidence in these matters should be prima facie believable. If such an evidence is filed, the onus shifts to the revenue. However, in this case even the identity of the creditor has not been proved on a prima facie basis by filing partnership deed or any other credible evidence. The existence of 17 partners stands falsified in view of the inquiries made by the AO, which was communicated to the assessee. The creditor was not assessed in the relevant ass....