2014 (12) TMI 204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....MENT Per P.K. Das; The learned AR for Revenue submits that the appeal was not signed by the proper person under the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. In this context, the learned Advocate placed a letter dated 24.10.2014 addressed to the Superintendent of Central Excise along with a copy of the Board Resolution. On perusal of the Board Resolution, we find that Shri R.K. Sridhar is authorized t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d of the appeal by Final Order No. 40481/2014 dated 18.6.2014. The relevant portion of the said order is reproduced below:- 3. After hearing both sides and on perusal of the records, we find that the demand of tax under Business Exhibition service and Technical Inspection and Certification Service, the Tribunal, in the applicant's own case, by Final Order No. 40042/2014 dated 21.1.2014 set asid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he payments made by the appellant were in respect of exhibitions conducted abroad. Similarly, from para 3.3 of the adjudication order, it is seen that the Technical Inspections were done outside India. Therefore, as per the provisions of the Rule 3(ii) of Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006, these two services are considered to be imported into Indi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ated 15.11.2012 and prays that the appeal may be allowed. 4. Regarding the demand of tax on 'processing of Textile materials for chemical wash' under 'Business Auxiliary Service', the learned counsel submits that such service is exempted vide Notification No.14/2004-ST dated 10.9.2004. It is seen that Notification No.14/2004-ST exempted taxable service provided to a client by a commercial conce....