2014 (11) TMI 939
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI) 1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') dated 12.09.2000 in ITA Nos. 856/Ahd/1193, 857/Ahd/1193, 858/Ahd/1193 and 859/Ahd/1193 for the Assessment Y....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... assessment year in question" 2. On the other hand, the assessee by way of filing Tax Appeals No. 833 to 836 of 2005 has sought to challenge the orders dated 29.10.2004 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot in ITA Nos. 813/RJT/2003 for A.Y. 1985-86, 814/RJT/2003 for A.Y. 1986-87, 815/RJT/2003 for A.Y. 1987-88 and 816/RJT/2003 for A.Y. 1988-89. These appeals were admitt....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....various stages where melting had taken place. The Appellate Authority as well as the Tribunal confirmed the findings of the Assessment Officer and therefore being aggrieved by the same, the assessee has filed the present appeals. 4. Learned advocate appearing for the assessee submitted that the books of accounts maintained by the assessee have not been considered though the Assessing Officer coul....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... submitted that the detraction of disclosure made by the assessee was an afterthought. He has supported the impugned decision imposing penalty upon the assessee. He supported the decisions impugned in the present appeals and submitted that the same do not call for any interference by this Court. 6. Heard both the parties and gone through the material available on record. In the instant case, we a....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI