Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (11) TMI 606

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....med by this Court.            "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in view of the amendment in Section 55(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961, the Tribunal was right in holding that the amount of Rs. 33,50,000/- included in the total income of Rs. 73,00,000/- received by the assessee on account of goodwill on his retirement from the firm is not liable to be assessee to capital gains tax?           2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the amount received by the assessee towards settlement of account and in consideration of settlement of civil suits represented his....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ital gains and taxed the same accordingly. 2.1 The assessee filed appeal before learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) contending that the impugned receipts were not in the nature of income under the provisions of the Income-tax Act and so the same should not have been included in the computation of total income. It was further contended that the receipts should have been taxed as Long Term Capital Gain because they were received in lieu of goodwill, which is a Long Term Capital Asset. As regards other receipts of Rs. 23,63,635/-, it was contended that the amount was received by the assessee as a result of various civil and criminal proceedings as such, the receipts were not in fact the income within the meaning assigned to it under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to be interfered with. 4. Learned advocate for the assessee has supported the order of the Tribunal and contended that the Tribunal following the decision of this Court as well as the Hon'ble Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the assessee which is not required to be interfered with and the appeal is required to be dismissed. 5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The Tribunal has, while allowing the appeal of the assessee, considered the decision of this Court in the case of CIT VS. MOHANBHAI PAMABHAI reported in 91 ITR 393 and other decisions of this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Paragraph No. 5 of the order of the Tribunal is reproduced as under:          "In the case of CIT....