1984 (2) TMI 333
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Appellants. Shri Mahesh Kumar, S.D.R., for the Respondent. ORDER This appeal is directed against the order of the Appellate Collector of Central Excise & Customs, New Delhi, dated 19-5-1976. Originally preferred as a revision application before the Cen- tral Government, on transfer to this Tribunal, the same is being treated as an appeal and is being disposed of as such. 2.  The appel....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t have recently clarified that a trade discount should be allowed by whatever name it is described. Presumably, Shri Kohli has referred to the Judgment dated November 14/15, 1983 of the Honourable Supreme Court whereby their lordships clarified certain points arising out of main judgment dated 7-10-1983 referred to earlier. The relevant portion from the judgment clarifying the scope of the express....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ferent nomenclature in the sale documents. What the Supreme Court have held is that mere nomenclature is not material : what is material is that the deduction sought should be recognised by an established practice of the trade as a trade discount. In the instant case the expression used is 'trade discount for freight'. The exact scope of the expression is not clear. In the commercial world also, o....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI