1984 (2) TMI 333
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Appellants. Shri Mahesh Kumar, S.D.R., for the Respondent. ORDER This appeal is directed against the order of the Appellate Collector of Central Excise & Customs, New Delhi, dated 19-5-1976. Originally preferred as a revision application before the Cen- tral Government, on transfer to this Tribunal, the same is being treated as an appeal and is being disposed of as such. 2.  The appel....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t have recently clarified that a trade discount should be allowed by whatever name it is described. Presumably, Shri Kohli has referred to the Judgment dated November 14/15, 1983 of the Honourable Supreme Court whereby their lordships clarified certain points arising out of main judgment dated 7-10-1983 referred to earlier. The relevant portion from the judgment clarifying the scope of the express....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ferent nomenclature in the sale documents. What the Supreme Court have held is that mere nomenclature is not material : what is material is that the deduction sought should be recognised by an established practice of the trade as a trade discount. In the instant case the expression used is 'trade discount for freight'. The exact scope of the expression is not clear. In the commercial world also, o....