Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2014 (11) TMI 368

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ations are arising out of a common order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) and therefore they are taken up together for disposal. 2. The issue involved in this case is denial of cenvat credit of service tax paid on inputs services viz. Courier Service used for export of goods. The adjudicating authority denied the credit which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. The learned advocate for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ta Coffee Ltd. - 2012-TIOL-209-CESTAT-MAD        (iii) Amalgamations Repco Ltd. Vs CCE Chennai - 2013 (31) STR 370 (Tri.-Chennai) 3. On the other hand, Ld.A.R submits that as per Rule 2(l) of CCR 2004, any input credit or input service would be integral to the manufacture of final products whereas in the present case, related to transportation of export goods and no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... CHA, Courier services and C&F service. It is seen that the Tribunal in the case of Nirma Ltd. (supra) rejected appeal filed by the assessee on this issue. However, the Tribunal in the case of Plus Paper Foodpac Ltd. (supra) held that CHA service, C&F service, shipping and courier service are eligible input services.  The Tribunal in the case of Pokarna Ltd. (supra) has examined the scope of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... goods was examined by the division bench in the above case, with reference to the definition of 'place of removal' under Section 4(3) of the Central Excise Act as also to Section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act. On a harmonious construction of the provisions, it was held that, in respect of the excisable goods cleared from factory for export and subsequently shipped from the port, the port of expo....