Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1984 (1) TMI 308

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hnan, J.D.R., for the Respondent. ORDER This is a Revision Application filed by M/s. Devidayal Non-ferrous Industries Pvt. Ltd. dated 12-6-1979 and is directed against the order-in-appeal No. 1492/78 passed by the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Bombay dated 2nd January, 1979, which has been transferred to this Tribunal and is being considered as an appeal. The short question involved in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....peal. Shri H.S. Durve, Chartered Accountant, appearing on behalf of the appellants drew the attention of the Bench to the following judgments of the Bombay High Court : (1) M/s. Shakti Insulated Wires Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. (reported in 1982 E.L.T. page 10). (2) M/s. Devidayal Rolling & Refineries Pvt. Ltd. v. H.V. Nadkarni & Ors. in the Misc. Petition Nos. 839 of 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stt. Collector of Central Excise. Shri Durve was, however, not able to produce any evidence to support his submission that the said amount of ₹ 21,954.96 was recovered by the Asstt. Collector in the manner stated by him. 2. The Departmental Representative stated that he has nothing to say in this case in view of the judgment referred to above. Though the above judgments were not in res....