2014 (10) TMI 747

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....substantial substantial questions of law:- "i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the the Hon'ble ITAT was right in law in interpreting section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by holding that prior to 1.10.2009 cases of transfer of land or buildings where the transaction was not registered with the stamp duty valuation authority, were out of the ambit of section 50C? ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in holding the issue in favour of the assessee for computation of segment rate at lower than the rate assessed by the Sub Registrar for registration of agricultural land in the particular village by State Valuation Authority? iii) Whether on the facts and in the circ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... at Rs. 83,07,949/-, cost of acquisition by adopting fair market value of the land at Rs. 13,89,720/- (i.e. at the rate of Rs. 1,50,954/- per acre) as on 1.4.1981 and indexed cost of acquisition computed at Rs. 69,06,908/-. The Collector, Jalandhar fixed the segment rates for sale of property in the Village where the sold land was situated at the rate of Rs. 25 lacs per acre for the purpose of payment of stamp duty. The sale consideration of the land i.e.9 acres 1 kanal 13 marlas sold by the assessee as per Collector's rate at the rate of Rs. 25 lacs per acre worked out at Rs. 2,30,15,625/-. Besides, this, the assessee had received another amount of Rs. 15,25,000/- on account of sale of mitti. Since the assessee had not declared long te....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion 50C will not be attracted. The revenue filed appeal before the Tribunal whereas the assessee preferred cross objections. Vide order dated 3.9.2012, Annexure A.3, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and partly allowed the cross objections. Hence the instant appeal by the revenue. 3. Learned counsel for the assessee respondent placed reliance on the order dated 14.1.2008, Annexure R.1 passed by Collector Jalandhar whereby according to him, the Collector Jalandhar had accepted the value of the registered sale deed assessed by the assessee. It was submitted that the same could not be produced earlier as it was not within the knowledge of the assessee. Learned counsel for the respondent argued that in view of documents Annexures R.1 to R.4 at....