AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (10) TMI 470
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ne any inquiry nor any verification, whereas, in fact, the assessment order is passed u/s 143(3) of the Act after thorough inquiry through show-cause notice and replies, and verification of all the issues sought to be revised. 3. That the learned CIT-IV, Ahmadabad has grievously erred in law and on facts in holding that the appellant's SEZ unit is not entitled to deduction u/s 10AA of the Act of Rs. 76.11 crores. 4. That the learned CIT-IV, Ahmadabad has grievously erred in law and on facts in holding that the appellant is not entitled to deduction u/s 10AA of the Act while computing book profit u/s 115JB of the Act. 5. On facts and in law, the entire income of appellant SEZ unit is not includible while calculating the book profit for the purpose of section 115JB of the Act. 6. That on facts and in law, the learned CIT-IV, Ahmadabad has grievously erred in holding that the interest income is required to be taxed as income from other sources, and that the appellant is not entitled to deduction u/s 10AA of the Act on the interest income. 7. That the learned CIT-IV, Ahmadabad has grievously erred in law and on facts in holding that the appellant is not entitled for set-....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e us admitted that adjudication of appeal for the Assessment Year 2009-10 will also adjudicate the appeal for the Assessment Year 2010-11. So, we proceed to adjudicate the appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10. 4. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the written submissions filed by both the parties and gone through all the materials brought on record and the decisions relied upon by both the parties. 5. It is a settled position that the provision of section 263 provides power of suo motu revision upon the Commissioner of Income Tax when the order passed by the Assessing Officer is found both erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. 6. Further, the assessment order can be considered as erroneous when it is found by the Commissioner of Income Tax that the order contains some mis-application of law or mis-construction of facts or non-application of mind on the part of the Assessing Officer. 7. Non-application of mind in the context means acceptance of the claim of the assessee without making any inquiry. 8. It is also an accepted position of law that the lack of inquiry on part of the Assessing Officer will result in the order being termed ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....05. The Assessee will not be entitled to exemption u/s 10AA on interest income earned on Bank FDRs. (iv) As interest income earned on FDRs is to be taxed as income from other sources, Assessee would not be entitled for set off of brought forward business loss, if any available, against income from other sources." 13. The first contention of the Ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee before us is that the Assessing Officer had during the course of assessment proceedings called for the explanation of the assessee for its claim of deduction u/s 10AA, brought forward loss, interest receipt from bank on fixed deposits and computation of income u/s 115JB of the Act and the assessee in reply submitted its explanation with evidences and supporting decisions. 14. The Assessing Officer after making inquiries and considering the submissions of the assessee accepted the claim of the assessee for deduction u/s 10AA, set off of brought forward business loss, interest income on fixed deposit receipts as part of business income and computation of income u/s 115JB of the Act. The Ld. Authorized Representative in support of the above arguments drew our attention to the notice issued ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....icer in respect of above issues was a possible view or not. 18. The first issue is in respect of eligibility of deduction u/s 10AA of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax considered that the assessee was not entitled for deduction u/s 10AA on the ground that the assessee has not fulfilled the conditions for eligibility of deduction u/s 10AA for carrying out the services as per section 2(z) of the SEZ Act, 2005 i.e. import for the purposes of re-export and has not earned any foreign exchange for the country which is the main intention behind the provisions of section 10AA of the Act. In view of this, the Commissioner of Income Tax ordered that the assessee is not entitled to exemption u/s 10AA of the Act, both while computing income as per normal provisions of the Act and book profit u/s 115JB of the Act. For the above issue, it is necessary to give a look at the provisions of the sub-section (1) of section 10AA of the Act which reads as under: "10AA. (1) Subject to the provisions of this section, in computing the total income of an assessee, being an entrepreneur as referred to in clause (j) of section 2 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, from his Unit, who begins to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... meantime, sourcing from domestic area may be permitted by units in the SEZs which are allowed to do trading, subject to this circular being cited and on production of an undertaking by the concerned unit that no income tax benefits will be available by the unit for trading, except in the nature of re-export of imported goods." 21. Thus, it is clear that SEZ units are not entitled for deduction u/s 10AA in respect of trading goods exported from SEZ when such goods were procured from Domestic Tariff Area and the assessee is entitled for income tax benefit u/s 10AA in respect of trading which is in the nature of re-export of imported goods. To the same effect is the decision of the Jaipur Bench of the Tribunal in the case of DCIT Vs. M/s Goenka Diamond & Jewellers Limited ITA No. 509/JP/2011 Assessment Year 2008-09. 22. Further, it is also not in dispute that the above activity of the assessee was started during the Assessment Year 2008-09. Thus, the only other condition is that the assessee must be an entrepreneur as referred to in clause (j) of section 2 of SEZ Act, 2005. The Section 2(j) of SEZ Act, 2005 reads as under: "Entrepreneur" means a person who has been granted a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he following items with all the facilities and entitlements admissible to a unit in the Surat Special Economic Zone subject to the provisions of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 and the rules and orders made thereunder, from Unit No. 364, on Plot No. 239, Surat Special Economic Zone, Sachin, Surat in the State of Gujarat. Authorized Operations:- Sr. No. Activity 01. TRADING:- Trading of Gold, Silver, Platinum, Palladium, Bars, Coins (other than legal tenders) and Medallions. {under chapter-71 of ITC (HS)} (1) CONDITIONS:- (i) You shall export the goods procured/imported, as per provisions of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 and Rules made there-under for a period of five years from the date of commencement of trading activities. For this purpose, you shall execute a fresh Bond- Cum-Legal Undertaking as prescribed under the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006, for both manufacturing and trading operation consolidated. (II) You shall achieve positive Net Foreign Exchange (NFE) as prescribed in the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006 for the period you operate as a Unit in the Special economic from the commencement of production....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....xport Promotion Council for EOUS and SEZS Circular no. 42 dated 26.03.2007 and viewed that the purchases made by the assessee from domestic tariff area should be treated as import and therefore, the purchase value should be reduced from the foreign exchange earnings of the assessee for calculating net foreign exchange earning. 27. The Ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee pointed out that the said Export Promotion Council for EOUS and SEZS Circular no. 42 dated 26.03.2007 contains only a proposed change in Rule 53 of SEZ Rules, 2006 but that change has not yet been incorporated. In support of the above, the Authorized Representative of the assessee filed before us clarification dated 27.02.2014 issued by Export Promotion Council for EOUS and SEZS no. EDC/SEZ/AM04/A.14 dated 26.02.2014 which reads as under: "From EPCES HO [email protected] Sent: Thu, 27 Feb. 2014 13:02:02:05 To "Mr. Mrugesh Shah" [email protected] Subject: Clarification-reg. Export Promotion Council for EOUS and SEZS Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India 8G, Hansalaya Building, 15, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001. Tel:23329767, 23329768, 23329769 Fax No. 011-2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ne" 29. Further, the Ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee pointed out that the assessee has received a renewal from Development Commissioner, Surat Special Economic Zone on 17.01.2013 upto a period of 5 years i.e. upto 25.10.2017 which conclusively proves that the annual performance report submitted by the assessee before the SEZ authorities showing positive net foreign exchange earnings were in accordance with the SEZ Act and SEZ Rules and the assessee complied with SEZ Act and SEZ Rules. 30. The Ld. Authorized Representative also pointed out that the approval committee of SEZ, who examined and approved the annual performance report filed by the assessee consists of various persons including Commissioner of Income Tax and they have not found any defect while monitoring assessee's working achieving positive net foreign exchange earnings as submitted in the annual performance report. 31. We find that no material has been brought on record by the Revenue to controvert the above submission of the assessee. Further, we find that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gestatner Duplicators Private Ltd. Vs. CIT 117 ITR 1 (SC) held as under: "In that situation we do....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....view. Therefore, the interference by the Commissioner of Income Tax with that view of the Assessing Officer in purported exercise of power available to him u/s 263 cannot be sustained. We, therefore, cancel the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax on this issue. 34. As a consequence of our finding, we delete the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax to the extent it was held the assessee is not entitled to exemption u/s 10AA of the Act both while computing the income as per normal provisions of the Act and book profit u/s 115JB of the Act. 35. Before parting with this issue, we would like to observe that in view of the instruction no. 4 of 24.05.2006 quoted above, deduction u/s 10AA is not available to the assessee in respect of profit relating to trading activities wherein goods for export were procured from domestic tariff area. However, we find that in the instant case, it is not the case of the Revenue that benefit of section 10AA was allowed to the assessee by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order in respect of income arising from goods exported by procuring the same from domestic tariff area. Therefore, no interference by us in this respect is called for. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....terest income which were earned by the assessee were from fixed deposit receipts with bank which were made by the assessee in the course of its trading business of import for the purposes of re-export, for obtaining Letter of Credit for its purchases. We thus find that the relevant fixed deposit receipts on which interest were earned were business assets of the assessee acquired in the course and for the purposes of its business. The fixed deposit receipts being business assets, we find no reason as to why interest income earned from such fixed deposit receipts could not be assessed as business income of the assessee. Our above view finds support from the recent decisions of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT & anr. Vs. Motorola India Electronics (P) Limited (2014) 265 CTR 94 (Kar.) wherein it was held that: "No doubt Sub-section 10(B) speaks about deduction of such profits and gains as derived from 100% EOU from the export of articles or things or computer software. Therefore, it excludes profit and gains from export of articles. But Subsection (4) explains what is the profit derived from export of articles as mentioned in Sub-section (1). The substituted Sub-s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Tax was not justified in interfering with the said view in the impugned order. 41. The other connected issue is that as per the view of the Commissioner of Income Tax, the interest income in question being derived by the assessee from Indian Bank, the same is to be excluded while computing profits derived from the export of articles or things or services for the purpose of section 10AA of the Act. Sub-section (7) of section 10AA provides the manner in which the profits derived from "export of articles or things or services" is to be computed for the purposes of section 10AA of the Act. Therefore, in view of the above specific provision in the section itself, "profits derived from the export of articles or things or services" cannot be computed in any other manner. Sub-section (7) of Section 10AA reads as under: "For the purposes of sub-section (1), the profits derived from the export of articles or things or services (including computer software) shall be the amount which bears to the profits of the business of the undertaking, being the Unit, the same proportion as the export turnover in respect of such articles or things or services bears to the total turnover of the busine....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....section 10B(4) has to be construed in a wider sense than the expression "profits and gains as are derived by a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking from the export of articles or things" appearing in section 10B(1) of the Act. We have already noticed that sub-section (1) has been expressly made subject to the provisions of the Section. Therefore, the meaning to be ascribed to the words used in that sub-section should be controlled or tempered by the language used in sub-section (4). So constructed it appears to us that the profits of the business of the undertaking includes not merely the profits derived by or from the undertaking, but also include any profits or income which are incidental to the carrying on of the business of the undertaking." To the same effect is the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Motorola India Electronics (P) Limited (supra). 43. In view of the above, we find that the view adopted by the Assessing Officer in this regard in the assessment order of not excluding interest income which was assessed as business income of the assessee for computing "profits derived from export of articles or things or services" was a possi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ew adopted by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order that interest income earned by the assessee on fixed deposit receipts are assessable under the head "business income" on the facts of the instant case was found to be a possible view and therefore, we have to also hold that set-off of brought forward business loss against such business income as done by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order was a possible view. Therefore, we set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax to the extent it directed that as interest income earned on fixed deposit receipts taxed as income from other sources, the assessee would not be entitled for set-off of brought forward business loss against such interest income. 47. The last issue relates to the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax whereby Commissioner of Income Tax directed the Assessing Officer to examine the correctness, genuineness and allowability of foreign exchange fluctuation loss of Rs. 70.97 crores and to decide the issue afresh. 48. According to the Commissioner of Income Tax, the Assessing Officer has not examined the correctness, genuineness and allowability of huge loss claimed by the assessee under th....