2010 (11) TMI 892
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... R.B. Mathur for the petitioner JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The vehicle in dispute was checked by the assessing officer and on production of documents, it was found that the documents were not bearing the seal of any check-post of Commercial Taxes Department of the State, therefore, the assessing officer proceeded on the presumption that the documents were not produ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....evying the penalty under section 78(10A) of the Act of 1994 and the Deputy Commissioner( Appeals) as well as the Rajasthan Tax Board both committed an illegality in setting aside the penalty order. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of the reasons assigned by both the appellate authorities for setting aside the penalty order passed by the assess....
TaxTMI