2014 (9) TMI 555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Ms. Amee Yajnik, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER Appellant has challenged judgment of the Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad ["the Tribunal"] dated 28-2-2011. By the said order, Tribunal remanded the proceedings for fresh consideration de novo to be decided in light of the observations made by the Tribunal in a detailed judgment. In....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ier" with merchant/traders in view of clear provision contained in Rule 7(1)(e) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002? (4)     Whether the proceedings initiated against the appellant for denial of Cenvat credit were permissible in the facts and circumstances of the case, and whether the proceedings were not barred by limitation as prescribed under proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Cen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in 2008 (232) E.L.T. 408, particularly when the fact and circumstances of present case are absolutely different than the case referred to herein above, wherein the case of Sheela Dyeing and Printing were directly received by manufacturer from the non-existing firms as declared in Alert Circular, whereas in the present case the fabrics has been received from the supplier traders/merchants who has ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ps within the meaning of the Explanation to Rule 7(2)? 2. Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out that the decision of Tribunal dated 24-1-2011 came up for consideration before the Division Bench of this Court in Tax Appeal No. 1153/2011 and connected appeals [2013 (290) E.L.T. 61 (Guj.)]. Division Bench framed the same questions, as those which are suggested in this appeal, and by i....