2014 (9) TMI 455

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) ORDER By consent, the writ petitions are  taken up for final disposal. 2. W.P.Nos.19709 to 19714 of 2014 pertain to the assessment years  2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 respectively. 3. The petitioner in these writ petitions is M/s.Bata India Limited, doing their business at No.829, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. The petitioner would state that their place....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecords submitted by them, they required some more details.  In response to the same, the petitioner submitted his detailed reply on  20.12.2013 and also given their explanation and prayed to the first respondent to give them liberty of personal hearing on a specified date and time  to once again submit the documents relevant to their reply and prayed for dropping of further proceedi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o the law laid down in the following decisions:- i) Amudha Metals v. Commercial Tax Officer (2007 (9) VST 478) ii) K.S.Shivji and Co v. State [16 STC 769] iii) State of UP v. Anil Kumar Ramesh [145 STC 646] iv) Shri Mariammal Fire Works v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes [2011 (38) VST 345 Mad] v) SRC Projects Pvt Ltd., Salem v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes [2010 (33) VST 333] vi) Ultra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....18.12.2013 has made a specific request for opportunity of personal hearing on a specific date and time in order to appear in person and once again submit  documents relevant to their reply. Admittedly, such opportunity has not been provided to the petitioner. A scrutiny of materials place before this Court would also disclose that the petitioner had fully cooperated with the first respondent,....