2014 (8) TMI 732
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ons of law at the hearing of the appeal :- "1) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified under the facts and circumstances of the case in confirming the order of CIT (A) ignoring the effect of Section 292 BB specially when the assessee had cooperated with the proceedings. 2) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified under the facts and circumstances of the case in confirming the order of CIT (A) that annulled the assessment order passed U/s 143(3) holding it void-ab-initio. 3) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified under the facts and circumstances of the case in setting aside the assessment order and confirming the CIT (A) order without considering that where no objection regarding vali....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Tribunal observed that time has been specified for the issuance of a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act, for assuming jurisdiction over the assessee to complete the assessment. The Tribunal held that a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act is of a statutory nature through which the Assessing Officer assumes jurisdiction over the assessee to frame an assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act. If the jurisdiction was not properly assumed by the Assessing Officer by issuing a valid notice under Section 143(2) of the Act, the assessment so framed would be without a valid assumption of jurisdiction and would be invalid. In the present case, it was noted by the Tribunal that the Assessing Officer had recorded in the order of assessment....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o ensure that the assessee has not understated the income or has not computed excessive loss or has not under-paid the tax in any manner, serve on the assessee a notice requiring him, on a date to be specified therein, either to attend his office or to produce, or cause to be produced, any evidence on which the assessee may rely in support of the return: [Provided that no notice under clause (ii) shall be served on the assessee after the expiry of six months from the end of the financial year in which the return is furnished." Under clause (ii) of sub-section (2) of Section 143, the Assessing Officer is required to serve, on the assessee, a notice requiring him to attend the office or to produce evidence on which the assessee may rely....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he return has been furnished. If a notice is not even issued within the period of six months from the end of the financial year in which the return is furnished, there would be no occasion to serve it upon the assessee within the stipulated period. In the present case, the facts which are not in dispute are that the assessee had filed its return of income on 30 September 2008 for AY 2008-09. The notice under Section 143 (2) of the Act ought to have been issued by 30 September 2009 which was the date of the expiry of the period of six months from the end of the financial year in which the return was furnished. A notice was, however, issued on 6 October 2009 much beyond the period of six months. In such a situation, there could be no occas....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t. The assessee is precluded from taking any objection in any proceeding or enquiry that the notice was (i) not served upon him; or (ii) not served upon him in time; or (iii) served upon him in an improper manner. In other words, once the deeming fiction comes into operation, the assessee is precluded from raising a challenge about the service of a notice, service within time or service in an improper manner. The proviso to Section 292 BB of the Act, however, carves out an exception to the effect that the Section shall not apply where the assessee has raised an objection before the completion of the assessment or reassessment. Section 292 BB of the Act cannot obviate the requirement of complying with a jurisdictional condition. For the Asse....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... notice under Section 143(2) of the Act is not a procedural irregularity and is not curable. The requirement of a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act cannot be dispensed with. In our view, where the Assessing Officer fails to issue a notice within the period of six months as spelt out in the proviso to clause (ii) of Section 143 (2) of the Act, the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 143 (3) of the Act would be invalid. This defect in regard to the assumption of jurisdiction cannot be cured by taking recourse to the deeming fiction under Section 292 BB of the Act. The fiction in Section 292 BB of the Act overcomes a procedural defect in regard to the non-service of a notice on the assessee, and obviates a challenge that the notic....
TaxTMI