Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1982 (12) TMI 207

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gal, Member (J) and Shri K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)]. - The short point involved in this case is whether honing sticks imported by the appellants should be classified under sub-heading (1) of Heading No. 68.01/16 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as done by the Department or under sub-heading (2) of the same Heading, as requested by the appellants. 2.  No one appeared on behalf of the appellants ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....msp; The impugned goods are described in the import documents as "honing sticks for the manufacture of ball and roller bearings". This description is indicative of the fact that the goods were machine-operated hones and neither side has disputed this. The appellants' only argument is that the word "hand" used in the expression, "but excluding hand polishing stones, whet stones, oil stones and hone....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....luded from sub-heading (2), the impugned goods, being machine-operated hones, continued to remain in sub-heading (2) which attracted a lower rate of duty. 5.  On behalf of the Department, Shri Chatterjee argued that what was stated in the BTN was not a part of the Customs Tariff Act, that going strictly by the wording of the Tariff, the word "hand" qualified only polishing stones and that, t....