Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (10) TMI 967

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Industries, 1987. The petitioner-company has also prayed for a direction to the effect that clause 7(e) inserted by notification dated May 28, 1991 is not retrospective. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner-company is a manufacturer of hydrogenated vegetable oil (vanaspati) and refind oil and is registered under the provisions of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act. The respondent-State announced Sales Tax Incentive Scheme for Industries, 1987 (in short, "the Incentive Scheme") by notification dated May 23, 1987. In view of the aforesaid notification dated May 23, 1987, the petitioner-company made expansion by installing new plant and machinery and also invested in construction of buildings. In ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the notification dated May 23, 1987. Submission of counsel for the petitioner-company is that the alleged case of evasion of lax was compounded on January 5, 1991, i.e., much prior to the aforesaid rejection dated December 11, 1991 and therefore, the compounding of tax would not entail the consequences as referred to in clause 7(e). Counsel for the petitioner-company further submits that clause 7(e) was inserted in the notification dated May 23, 1987 vide notification dated November 28, 1991 and the same is not retrospective in nature and would not apply to the pending application of the petitioner-company. In support of the said submission, counsel for the petitioner-company placed reliance on paras 7, 8 and 9 of the judgment of this ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ns to be recorded in writing, waive the condition mentioned in sub-clause (e) above. 9(c) The Screening Committee shall be empowered to amend, suspend, restore or cancel the sanction for eligibility certificate accorded by it and copies of such orders shall be endorsed to the assessing authority.' 8. The relevant clause 7(e) of the Scheme merely stipulates that the industrial unit covered by this scheme shall not be entitled to claim any benefits under it if it has been penalised for avoidance or evasion of tax or any case of avoidance or evasion of tax is pending against it at any forum. The proviso gives power to the Screening Committee to waive such condition in appropriate cases. The proviso was inserted in clause 7(e) with ef....