Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1981 (5) TMI 121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... - This is an appeal filed by Howrah Enterprises, Howrah against order (original) No. 206(19)80.Collr. 36/81, dated 8-4-81 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta, (a) demanding duty on cotton fabrics (processed cotton beltings) exceeding 15 CMs in width valued Rs. 8,90,402 88 removed during the period from 31-3-77 to 7-8-80 without observing Central Excise formalities and without paym....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....not furnished because the allegations in the Show Cause Notice (SCN) were that they had removed cotton beltings misdeclaring them as processed 'hair beltings'. 5. There were 20 allegations in regard to the goods cleared by them as cotton beltings. 6. At the time of hearing on 3-3-81 they were only asked to separate the figures of 'beltings' with more than 15 CMs width up to 15 CMs ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eared in the past. 11. In the circumstances,the Advocate pleaded that the demand for duty was based on wrong premises and there was no ground for imposition of penalty on them. 12. The Board has carefully considered the facts of the case and the submissions written and oral, made by the appellants. 13. The Board observes that the appellants had in fact furnished the figures....