2014 (8) TMI 180

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Shri D D Joshi, Supdt (AR) PER : Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order denying the input credit on cement received in their factory on account of difference of weighment shown in the invoice and actually done in their factory. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a manufacturer of cement and they have having mother ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nitiated and the impugned orders were passed. Aggrieved from the said order, appellants are before me. 3. The ld. counsel for the appellant submits that the difference of weight is only due to weighment done on various weighments methods and the maximum difference works out to 2% of the total quantity, which is only a mirage difference the product being 'cement' and the same can be allowed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned orders are to be upheld. 5. Heard both sides. Considered the submissions. 6. In this case, the appellant have taken the credit on the basis of invoices issued by the supplier and quantity mentioned therein. There is no allegation against the appellant that the goods have been diverted during the transit or there is any pilferage of the goods during the course of transportation. Further, ....