2014 (8) TMI 166

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R P. C. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the order dated 15th November 2011 passed under Rule 86 of Schedule II of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax. The impugned order dated 15th November 2011 upheld the order dated 14th October 2008 passed by the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) attaching the Petitioner's movab....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....earing could not took place. It is submitted on behalf of the Petitioner that as it is evident from the letter dated 15th June 2011 of the predecessor of the present Commissioner who passed the impugned order, a personal hearing is normally given before the disposal of the appeal filed under Rule 86 of the II Schedule of the Act. 3. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot an appealable order under the Act. Therefore, it is the last chance for the Petitioner to ensure that all facts are brought on record in the correct perspective taking into account the context. Therefore, the Petitioner would be precluded from pointing any facts necessary in support of its case. The consequence of the appeal order upholding the order of the TRO are grave for the Petitioner. ....