2014 (7) TMI 835
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... R. Shah And K. J. Thaker,JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. Paresh M. Dave, Advocate ORDER (Per : Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Shah) 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned orders, as such passed in respective appeals, being appeal Nos. E-12304/13, E-12306/13, C-12313/13, C-12311/13, by the learned CESTAT, West Zone, Ahmedabad, respective appellants have preferred the present Tax A....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s, therein. However, Shri. Gupta has requested the Court to grant some more time to the appellants to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 8 lacs with the adjudicating authority and on that the adjudicating authority may be directed to decide the matters in accordance with law and on merits. 3. Under the circumstances, so as to give one additional opportunity to the respective appellants to make dep....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI