2014 (7) TMI 751

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., AM This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 23.11.2011 of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The only dispute raised by the assessee in this appeal is regarding addition made by AO u/s 10B (7) read with section 80IA (10). 2. The facts in brief are that the assessee who was in the business of export, had reimbursed a sum of Rs. 1987718/-to Pyramid Consulting Engi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erefore, asked the assessee to explain as to why the payment should not be estimated under the provisions of section 10B(7) read with section 80IA (10). The AO observed that the assessee did not submit any explanation. The AO, therefore, concluded that by taking the services of employees of the sister concern, the assessee had shown more than ordinary profits. He noted that the employees cost in c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l before Tribunal. 3. Before us, the learned AR for the assessee submitted that the method adopted by AO for application of section 80I (10) was not correct. He has computed the revenue corresponding to the employee hired and had treated the same as profit earned by the assessee which was incorrect. There was no material produced to show that the payment made by the assessee for hiring of the e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uces to the assessee more than the ordinary profits the AO for the purpose of allowing deduction u/s 10B) may take the amount of profit as may be reasonably deemed to have been earned by the assessee. In this case the assessee which is engaged in the business of export had hired some employees from the sister concern which had been reimbursed at cost. The AO, therefore, has concluded that the asse....