Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (7) TMI 564

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed judgment and order passed by the learned ITAT, Dated : 25.10.2013, in I.T.A. No. 3207/Ahd/2010, the appellant-Revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeal to consider the following proposed question of law; "(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT has erred in law in confirming the order of CIT(A) deleting the disallowance of deduction u/s. 80IB of the Income T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ousing society, which is a separate legal entity, which through the Development Agreement assigned the construction work of tenements to the assessee. According to the Assessing Officer, the assessee was just a contractor constructing the flats and not a developer. 3. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order of assessment passed by the Assessing Officer denying deduction under Section 80....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... We have heard Shri. Varun Patel, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant- Revenue and perused and considered in detail the order passed by the learned AO, the orders passed by the learned CIT(A) as well as the learned Tribunal. There are concurrent findings of facts given by the CIT(A) as well as ITAT, holding the petitioner as developer. It also requires to be noted that even the l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... down by the ITAT A Bench in the case of M/s. Shakti Corporation, Baroda for A.Y. 2005-06, dated 07.11.2008. No distinguishing facts in the relevant assessment year 2008-09 could be pointed out on behalf of the Revenue. In these Facts of the case, we hold that no interference in the order of the learned CIT(A) is called for which is confirmed and the grounds of appeal of the Revenue are dismissed.....