Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (7) TMI 390

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 1998-1999 is directed against the orders of the CIT(A). 2. The only ground of the appeal of the assessee is as under:     "1. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of AO in imposing penalty of Rs. 8,75,000/- under section 271(1)(c) of the A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fact, in this case, the assessee has admitted bogus wages, and therefore, penalty under section 271(1)(c) was levied on the assessee. He relied on the decision of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in CIT Vs. Lallubhai Jogibhai Patel, 261 ITR 216 and A.M. Shah & Company Vs. CIT, 238 ITR 415 (Guj). 5. The learned counsel for the assessee in his rejoinder submitted that the assessee has never ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... wages to receipts in case of the assessee is higher compared to such ratio in case of Venus Jewels P. Ltd. 6. We have considered rival submissions and have perused the orders of the AO and the CIT(A). We find that there is no evidence brought on record on behalf of the Revenue in this case to prove that the assessee was indulging in making entries of bogus payments in its wage account. In fact....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....acts stated by the AO in his order under section 131 while impounding assessee's wage register that ratio of wages to receipts in case of assessee is higher compared to such ratio in case of Venus Jewels P. Ltd. In these facts of the case, we are of the considered opinion that the disallowance has been made by the department out of wage expenses by way of estimate only. The disallowance was consid....