2014 (7) TMI 352

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, Dy Commissioner, (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: Ashok Jindal: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order for denying the sanctioned refund amount paying by cash. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is the manufacture of batteries which they were exporting outside India. In one of the clearance, the foreign buyer has cancelled the order and the same was supplied to the Indian N....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se circumstances, a refund of Rs. 11,32,694.69 was to be given to the appellant. Accordingly, the appellant filed a refund claim. The adjudicating authority has sanctioned a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- in cash and the remaining amount he held that the said amount will be credit in CENVAT amount. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal. 3. Heard both sides. 4. The learned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2. The matter has been examined by the Board. Cash refund of the unutilised Modvat credit is an incentive given to manufacturers and exporters and non-grant of such claim will affect the competitiveness of the Indian industry in the International market. Accordingly I am directed to say that all such refund claims filed under the provisions of rule 57F(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 should b....