Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2014 (6) TMI 585

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....R.) JUDGEMENT Per Dr. D. M. Misra : This is an application for waiver of predeposit of duty of Rs.3.28 Crores and equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. The ld. Advocate appearing for the Applicant, has submitted that the Applicants are engaged in the manufacture of powder hair dye falling under Chapter Heading No.3305 of CETA, 1985. The said go....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at since each of the sachet is weighing less than 10 gms., therefore, their goods are not required to be affixed with MRP on its pack being exempted under Rule 34 (b) of Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977. It is the submission of the ld.Advocate that when the goods are cleared from the factory in the packed condition, it contains more than 10 gms., therefore, the goods are liable to be assessed unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... perused the records. We find that the disputes relates to whether the goods are liable to be assessed under Section 4 or 4A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, a debatable issue. We find that the Applicants had submitted that the differential duty applying the value under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944, has been worked out to Rs.52.72 lakhs and the computation of demand by the ld.Adjudicati....