2014 (6) TMI 184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN, SRI. JOSEPH SEBASTIAN (PARACKAL) FOR THE RESPONDENT : SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX JUDGEMENT Dr. Manjula Chellur C. J.- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. We have gone through the orders of the Assessing Officer, the revisional authority and the order of the Tribunal. The entire controversy involved in this case is with regard to the exact statu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....interests of the Revenue. Of course, a detailed explanation by way of reply was given by the present appellant. The entire discussion of the revisional authority is directed against the application of mind by the Assessing Officer with reference to the nature of business conducted by the appellant-assessee. It is also not in dispute that the Assessing Officer is required to apply his mind and cond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee. It was also the case of the appellant-assessee that the case of the appellant has to be considered only by looking into the Kerala State Co-operative Societies Act and nothing else. According to them, certificate of registration would indicate their claim and also decide what exactly is the nature of business. The revisional authority was justified in saying, with the introduction of sectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on 80P(4) of the Act. As there was no discussion at all by the Assessing Officer from this perspective, there was justification for the revisional authority to conclude that the order of the Assessing Officer was not only erroneous but prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. A very detailed discussion giving the reasons why the matter should be reconsidered by the Assessing Officer came to be....