Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (6) TMI 114

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (for short 'the First Appellate Authority') and the Assessing Authority insofar as levy of surcharge for the block assessment period from 01-04-1989 to 28-01-2000. 2. The appeal was admitted for considering the following substantial question of law:           Whether the Tribunal was correct in setting aside the order of the Appellate Commissioner that no surcharge can be levied despite the assessee having admitted that the surcharge is payable for the assessment year 2000-2001 before the Appellate Commissioner corresponding to the said Financial year? 3. The learned counsel appearing for both the parties submit that the substantial question of law raised in this appeal is covered by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s, Parliament, has opted for the date, namely, the year in which the search is initiated, which date would be relevant for applicability of a particular FA. Therefore, we have to read the proviso as it stands.             38. There is one more reason for rejecting the above submission. Prior to 1st June, 2002, in several cases, tax was prescribed sometimes in the 1961 Act and sometimes in FA and often in both. This made liability uncertain. In the present case, however, the rate of tax in case of block assessment at 60 per cent was prescribed by S.113 but the year of FA imposing surcharge was not stipulated. This resulted in the above four ambiguities. Therefore clarification was neede....