2014 (6) TMI 57

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the appellants are manufacturing dutiable product POY and were also manufacturing the cotton yarn on which Nil rate of duty was paid by availing exemption under Notification No.30/2004-CE, dt.09.07.2004. It was also noticed that since the appellant did not maintain separate accounts for the services consumed for dutiable and exempted products, they were liable to pay the amount which is equivalent to 8% or 10% as the case may be, of the value of exempted goods cleared from the factory premises. A show cause notice was issued to the appellant. The appellant contested the entire allegations made in the show cause notice on the ground that the appellant had reversed the amount of CENVAT Credit availed on common inputs and hence there cann....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of entire amount of CENVAT Credit availed on the common input services is enough compliance of the provisions of Rule 6; when an assessee manufactures and clears dutiable as well as exempted product. 6. At the outset, we find that the contention of the ld. Counsel that they have reversed an amount of Rs.3,26,564/- of the CENVAT Credit availed on common input services for the period 18.01.2007 to 31.03.2008 and 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2010. To that extent, we hold that the appellant has complied with the law as has been settled by the higher Court that once the CENVAT Credit is reversed, it has to be held that the appellant had not availed such CENVAT Credit. For this, we gainfully rely upon the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of....