Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (5) TMI 656

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....estaurants as well as earning franchise fees by lending its expertise and technical know how, during the year under consideration, had shown an amount of Rs.15,18,077/- as outstanding against M/s. Sujash Members Association Ltd. Since the said amount had been outstanding for more than three years prior to A.Y. 2008- 09, the AO sought the assessee to file details with respect to the credit and had enquired whether the liability was discharged. The assessee was also required to file confirmation of the existence of credit if the same was not discharged till date. The assessee, in its in reply, stated that it had entered into an agreement with M/s. Sujash Members Association Ltd to run the restaurant business at an agreed royalty on sales. How....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ilability of creditors and lack of correspondence with them would not obliterate the debt. Besides the said contention, the assessee stated that the entire liability was paid in the immediate succeeding assessment year 2009-10 by way of assignment of the same to one of the partners, namely, Mr. Sudhir Chaddha and as far as the Assessee firm is concerned, the said liability had been paid. However, the Ld.CIT(A) did not accept the claim of the assessee as the assesee had not filed any confirmation from the concerned party to the effect that the liability remained outstanding and due from the assessee. The Ld.CIT(A) had further observed that notice issued to the party at the address furnished by the assessee also was returned back unserved. Al....