2014 (5) TMI 127

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ady been recovered. An application was filed for waiving the condition of pre-deposit of interest and penalty, which was sine qua non for hearing of the appeal. The Tribunal vide order dated 15.2.2012 waived the condition of pre-deposit of interest and penalty. The respondent - Department moved a miscellaneous application No. E/446/12 clarifying that the appellant did not deposit the entire amount of duty and sought rectification of order dated 15.2.2012. The concerned Commissioner filed an affidavit in support of the application stating that the appellant had deposited only Rs. 58,28,711/- on 27.7.2011. On the date of hearing on 27.7.2012 before the Tribunal the appellant controverted the assertion made by the Revenue and the Tribunal dire....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....notice on behalf of the respondents. 6. With the consent of the parties, the appeal is taken on board and the arguments have been heard. 7. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to show any justification for making a deliberate at tempt to mis-lead the Court for the purpose of acquiring interim relief. All that has been submitted by Mr. Sharma is that there was typographical error which created wrong impression in the mind of the Tribunal. However, such a stand taken by the appellant cannot be accepted, because in paras (a) (b) & (c) of the memorandum of appeal the appellant has claimed in categorical terms that the amount of duty demand had already been paid, then there is no question of any typographical mi....