Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (4) TMI 1016

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P. C. 1. This Appeal challenges the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "ITAT"), Pune Bench in Income Tax Appeal No.149/PN/08. The Assessment Year in question is 2005-06. By the order delivered on 19th November 2010, the Tribunal has allowed the Appeal preferred by the respondent - assessee. The Revenue is therefore in Appeal invoking section 206A of the Income Tax Act, 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oing through the case records, the Commissioner of Income TaxI Kolhapur, found that the order passed by the Assessing Officer is prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. He noted the issues on which the order could be said to be so vitiated. He, therefore, directed a notice to be issued. After giving an opportunity to the assessee and considering the assessee's submissions, the Commissione....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sesse's own case for the Assessment Year 2003-04 and 2004-05. This order was delivered in Income Tax Appeal Nos.143 and 144/PN/2008. Apart therefrom on merits also, the ITAT found that the view taken by the Assessing Officer was a possible view. The question was debatable. In such circumstances, the power under section 263 could not have been invoked by the Commissioner. The ground raising ide....