Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (4) TMI 775

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....:- PER : J Sudhakar Reddy This is an appeal preferred by the Revenue directed against the order of the Ld.CIT(A), Faridabad dated 16.01.2012 pertaining to the AY 2008-09 on the following grounds. 2. Brief facts: The brief facts of the case as brought out at para 4 of the Ld.CIT(A)'s order which is extracted for ready reference.     "4. The brief facts of the case are tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....deduction of tax u/s 194J from 5.61% to 11.33% with effect from 1.6.2007 but the tax in the month of June and July,2007 was inadvertently deducted at pre amended rates. Since there was sort deduction of tax in the month of June and July 2007, the AO has held the assessee in default and passed order u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act raising the demand of Rs.5,08,27,288/- on account of short deduction o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ightly applied the Circular of the CBDT No.275/201/95 and IT(B) dt. 29.1.1997 and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Cocacola Beverages P.Ltd. vs. CIT, 293 ITR 226  and granted relief to the assessee. At page 11 he held as follows:     "As per the above statement, the appellant has deducted total tax of Rs.11,55,68,841/- u/s 194J from the paym....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uctor has satisfied the officer-in-charge of TDS, that taxes due have been paid by the deductee assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest u/s 201(1A) of the Act till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee assessee or the liability for penalty u/s 271C of the Act.' The appellant has also placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ....