Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (11) TMI 541

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ORDER Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed the present appeal. I have heard Smt. R. Jagdev, learned SDR, appearing for the Revenue. Nobody appeared for respondents. 2. After hearing the learned SDR and on perusal of the records, it is seen that the original authority sanctioned the refund claim of Rs. 27,951/-. Revenue filed appeal before the C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Also, there is no prerequisite for establishing one-to-one correlation between inputs and final products. The Hon'ble Apex Court, in Dai Ichi Karkaria case [1999 (112) E.L.T. 353 (S.C.)], observed that it is not essential for the assessee to establish exact mathematical equation between inputs utilized and the finished goods manufactured. Similarly, the Hon'ble Apex Court has ruled in SAIL v. CC....