Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (9) TMI 898

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r is borne on the files of the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Special Circle-III, Ernakulam. The petitioner used to import superior kerosene oil from abroad under the import licence granted by the Government of India. The import is done through Madras and Kochi ports. During the assessment year 1996-97, the petitioner imported 5,616.454 kls of kerosene through Kochi port and out of which 1,595.001 kls were sold locally and 4,728 kls were transported to Pondicherry by way of branch transfer as claimed by him. The Intelligence Officer of the Intelligence Wing of the Department had inspected the business premises of the petitioner on July 5, 1996 and October 8, 1996 and had noticed certain discrepancies in the books of account maintained by the dealer and pointing out those omissions and commissions had prepared shop inspection reports, SIR No. 190472/July 5, 1996 and SIR No. 33051/October 8, 1996 and the same had been served on the assessee.   The petitioner had filed its annual returns both under the KGST Act and the CST Act for the assessment year 1996-97. In the returns filed for the purpose of KGST assessments, the assessee had declared the total and taxable turn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essment order passed, the assessing authority once again merely incorporates the reasoning of the intelligence officer for levying penalty under section 45A of the KGST Act and then proceeds to observe: "The abovesaid proposals were duly communicated to the assessee as per this officer's pre-assessment notice dated October 20, 2000 inviting objections, if any. The assessee has received the notice on November 9, 2000, but had not utilised the opportunity afforded till date. The assessee has neither responded nor filed objections. Therefore, it is presumed that the assessee has no objection against the proposal. In the circumstances the proposals are confirmed and the assessment order under the CST Act for 1996-97 stands completed as already proposed." By the aforesaid best judgment assessment orders, the assessing authority had made huge additions to the conceded taxable turnover and also has denied the claim of branch transfers made by the assessee and has treated the entire turnover as inter-State sales. In the first appeals filed, the first appellate authority has not made any improvement in the order passed by the assessing authority. A perusal of the orders passed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....paid by the appellant for the transport of kerosene from Kochi to Coimbatore. The above findings of the assessing authority is not rebutted by the appellant. The appellant has not produced the transporting copy of the delivery note which is under the custody of the appellant and the stock transfer to Pondicherry could be established by the transporting copy of the departmental delivery note. The records seized at the time of inspection evidenced that the appellant has effected unaccounted transactions under the guise of stock transfer. Considering the quantum of suppression detected by the Intelligence Wing which comes to Rs. 3,45,68,640 we are of the view that the addition made by the assessing authority and sustained by the first appellate authority and levy of tax on the above amount under the CST Act is fair and reasonable and therefore we confirm the decision of the authorities below in this case. Since the difference in the total turnover as per monthly return and total turnover conceded as per accounts amounts to Rs. 1,74,000 has not been properly explained by the appellant, the levy of tax on Rs. 1,74,000 under the KGST Act is also confirmed." The assessee, being aggriev....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to mean the computation of the amount of tax and at other times to mean the whole procedure laid down for imposing the liability on the tax-payer. The term "assessment " used in the Act comprises the provisions relating to the subject-matter of taxation, rate of tax, basis at which the quantum of tax is to be arrived at, the exemptions to be given and the authorities for enforcing tax liability. The procedure for assessment should comply with the rules of natural justice and if not it would be unreasonable restriction violating both articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India. Even in the case of best judgment assessment, the assessee should be offered an opportunity to explain every material gathered and intended to be used against him by the authority. Taxing statutes generally authorise imposition of penalty for delay in filing returns, concealment of tax liability, default in payment of tax, contravention of mandatory provisions, etc. The proceedings for imposition of penalty are quasi-criminal in nature. This power of imposing penalty is only discretionary and the penalty shall not be ordinarily imposed unless the person/dealer has acted deliberately in defiance of law o....