Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (4) TMI 360

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent : Shri Govind Dixit, DR JUDGEMENT Per Rakesh Kumar: The appellant provided services of procuring of sales orders to M/s. Coperion Werner pfleiderer Gmbh Co. KG, Germany and Coperion Waeschle Gmbh Co. KG, Germany, who are the manufacturers of bulk material handling systems. The services provided by the appellant is Business Auxiliary services. The department was of the view....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....M/s. Coperion Werner pfleiderer Gmbh Co. KG, Germany and Coperion Waeschle Gmbh Co. KG, Germany, who are the recipient of the services provided by the appellant, that service provided by the appellant is Business Auxiliary services (commission agent) covered by Rule 3(1)(iii) of the Export of Services Rules, 2005 and since it has been received by persons abroad not having any branch or business es....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner in the impugned order and pleaded that the services being provided by the appellant cannot be treated as export of service as the same have been performed in India and in this regard, he drew our attention to the Commissioners findings at internal page 27 and 28 of the impugned order. He pleaded that the appellant have not been able to establish....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd payment for the same has been received in convertible foreign exchange. Prima facie, we find that all these three conditions have been satisfied in this case. The services being in relation to business or commerce, the question of their export would be decided on the basis of location of the person using these services for his business, not on the basis of place of performance. We also find tha....