Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (7) TMI 877

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of revision under section 20(1) of the said Act. The facts, as necessary for disposal of the present appeal are that in the course of its business as a manufacturer of liquor under D2 licence granted under the provisions of the A. P. Excise Act, 1968, the appellant had to sell the liquor in various containers, viz., bottles, cartons and other packing material. The main dispute is in regard to levy of tax on the containers. According to the appellant, it had followed the principles as laid down by the Supreme Court in Raj Sheel v. State of Andhra Pradesh [1989] 74 STC 379, and accordingly, the Appellate Deputy Commissioner by his order dated July 17, 1992 held that there was separate sale of packing material and the norms were satisfi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondent sought to sustain the impugned action on the ground that the Commissioner had issued show-cause notice well within the time and orders are passed and therefore there is no illegality. On this and other submissions made, the point, which arises for consideration, is whether in the facts and circumstances, the exercise of powers under section 20 of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 is sustainable. Since the plea of "barred by limitation" is being taken up for consideration, we are not going into the merits of the case. Therefore, it would suffice to note that admittedly in this case, the order of the appellate authority is dated July 17, 1992 and the consequential orders were passed by the assessing authority on October 23, 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....which reads as follows: "20 Revision by Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and other prescribed authorities.-(1) The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes may suo motu call for and examine the record of any order passed or proceeding recorded by any authority, officer or person subordinate to it, under the provisions of this Act, including sub-section (2) of this section and if such order or proceeding recorded is prejudicial to the interests of Revenue, he may make such enquiry, or cause such enquiry to be made and subject to the provisions of this Act, may initiate proceedings to revise, modify or set aside such order or proceeding and may pass such order in reference thereto as it thinks fit. (2) Powers of the nature referred to in sub-secti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted by the Special Appellate Tribunal in any case, or by reason of the fact that an appeal or other proceeding is pending before the Special Appellate Tribunal or the Supreme Court involving a question of law having a direct bearing on the order or proceeding in question, the period during which the stay order was in force or such appeal or proceeding was pending shall be excluded in computing the period of four years specified in this section for the purpose of exercising the power under this section." Apparently, the aforesaid provision is virtually the powers, specifically, conferred on the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to revise any proceedings or orders. De hors the fact that it has undergone the natural course through the assess....