Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (4) TMI 300

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es, tubes and flaps were inserted into tyres at the time of clearance. In respect of clearance to Motor Vehicles Manufactures, Cenvat credit was taken of the duty already paid on tubes and flaps. As regards the tubes and flaps cleared to the appellants in the replacement market, no Cenvat credit of duties paid by the supplier for tubes and flaps was taken by the appellant. Proceedings were initiated on the ground that the appellant should have maintained separate accounts since the sale of tubes and flaps to the dealers in the replacement market amounts to trading and since the appellant did not maintain separate accounts of input services, namely GTA service utilized for tubes and flaps and tyres partly, the appellant is required to pay 5%....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at Credit Rules are not at all applicable to the case of the appellant. Further, he also submitted that Revenue has demanded the service tax on the value of traded goods. He submitted that for demanding an amount as contemplated under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the value of traded goods could not have been taken. 3. On the other hand, learned A.R. relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Metro Shoes Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I [2008 (10) S.T.R. 382 (Tri.-Mumbai)] and submitted that the appellant is not eligible for proportionate credit in respect of the services utilized for trading activities. 4. We find that the decision in the case of Metro Shoes Pvt. Ltd. (supra) also is on ....