2014 (4) TMI 225

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng two questions of law are involved in this matter: (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is legally justifed to hold that the paddy husk, purchased by dealer was deoiled. (ii) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Trade Tax Tribunal was legally justified to hold purchase of paddy husk exempt from tax in view of the decisions of thi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y included in the Notification No. 5787 dated 8th September, 1981 and Notification No. 3217, dated 15th June, 1985 appears to be logical. It appears that paddy husk is the outer covering of paddy and on its removal, rice is obtained in the process of polishing of rice which contains oil element. In any view of the matter, subsequent Notification is clearly used the word rice husk and paddy husk as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was inserted. Even then, the rice husk was not deleted. No explanation was offered therefor. Both rice husk and paddy husk, thus, found place in the notification. Indisputably, therefore, paddy husk was subjected to for the first time by reason of the said notification dated 6.6.1996. Yet again, while giving a purported new look to the entry in the notification dated 15.1.2000, the words 'ric....