Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (12) TMI 431

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... but was on account of various unsustainable objections raised by the department from time to time. For the aforesaid conclusions, the learned single judge has relied upon the observation made in the aforesaid Division Bench decision. It is relevant to note at this stage that the decision of the Division Bench in W.A. Nos. 94 to 96 of 2000 Lavanya Enterprises v. Secretary to Government of Tamil Na....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....les tax dues, demurrage charges or penal interest. Having regard to all these aspects, we do not find any justification to differ from the ultimate conclusion of the learned single judge. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. The appellant demanded sales tax on the value of the sandalwood which was resisted by the respondent on the plea that since the goods were purchased for e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r section 5(3) of the Act with respect to the sandalwood purchased by them in the auction held on February 25, 1999. State of Tamil Nadu was directed to release the goods without claiming demurrage and penalty. On the previous date of hearing, i.e., on March 21, 2006, counsel appearing for the respondent had brought to our notice that in pursuance to the directions given in the impugned orde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the orders dated February 22, 2002 and March 10, 2003, as aforesaid, had been passed and the respondent is not liable to pay the sales tax and that the appellants had accepted those orders and the same have become final. He, however, insisted that the respondent was liable to pay demurrage charges for non-removal of the goods within the stipulated time. According to him, the goods kept on lying in....