2014 (3) TMI 920

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Commissioner (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: P R Chandrasekharan: The appeal and stay application are directed against the Order-in-Original no. 09/RN/COMMR/M-II/2013-14 dated 24.09.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II. Vide the impugned order, excise duty demand of Rs.1,68,90,942/- has been confirmed against the appellant for the period April, 2011 to October, 2011 along wi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e present case also, pre-deposit of 6% of the duty confirmed be ordered. Alternatively, he submits that the case be transferred to the other Bench of the Tribunal, who had decided the matter earlier. 3.1 The learned Counsel also points out that except for the demand for the period April, 2003 to March, 2008, all the other demands were for the normal period of time. He also relies on the decisio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d that when the stay petition came up for consideration before this Tribunal on the last occasion on 21.1.2014, this Tribunal after considering the submissions made by both the sides, directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the duty confirmed on the ground that on the earlier decisions, pre-deposit was ordered taking into account the demand for the normal period of time. In the case....