Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (3) TMI 711

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ynthetic fiber on which Cenvat credit is taken. On 3/2/04 and 12/2/05, there was fire accident in the blow room, in which the raw materials in the blow room were destroyed. The appellant received insurance claims of Rs. 16,11,601/- and Rs. 38,43,080/- from M/s. United India Insurance in respect of loss of raw material suffered by them in the fire accidents on 3/2/2004 and 12/2/2005 respectively. Since, intimation regarding these fire accident had been given by the appellant to the department, departmental officers conducted enquiries and found that in these fire accidents, the Cenvat credit availed inputs/fibers had been destroyed on which Cenvat credit involved was Rs. 5,02,411/- to which the appellant were not entitled. On this basis, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct, and that in view of this, the confirmation of Cenvat credit demand, interest and imposition of penalty is not justified. 4. Shri. M.S. Negi, the learned Departmental Representative opposed the prayer by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order and pleaded that the inputs damaged/destroyed had not been taken up for manufacture and, were not the inputs in process and hence, the same have to be treated as the inputs as such, destroyed and the appellant would not be eligible for Cenvat credit in respect of the same, and that in this regard he relies upon the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Monica Electronics Ltd. vs. CCE, New Delhi reported in 1995 (75) ELT 440 (Tribunal), Golden Polymex (India....