Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (3) TMI 648

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the addition relating to difference between the Operating income disclosed by the assessee and the amount shown in the TDS certificates made by the AO in both the years. 3. The facts relating to both the issues are stated in brief. The assessee is a licensed custom house agent. The assessment in the hands of the assessee for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 were completed u/s. 143(3) respectively on 17-12-2007 and 12.11.2008. Subsequently, the Assessing officer noticed that the Operating income declared by the assessee in the returns of income was lower than that shown in the TDS certificates relating to the respective years. The details of the same are tabulated below: Assessment Year....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... takes place on actual basis. The assessee submitted that it has duly offered the receipts relating to transport charges and services charges as its income by crediting them to the profit and loss account, as they only constitute its operating income. 3.1 However, the Assessing officer took the view that the assessee has not substantiated the above said explanations with documentary evidences. Accordingly, he rejected the same and assessed the difference amount shown in the tabulation as the income of the assessee in the respective years. 4. Before the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee challenged the re-opening of the assessment for both the years and also the addition made by the Assessing officer in both the years. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the vali....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oss account and receipts relating to reimbursement of expenses are shown in the "Expenses receivable account". He submitted that the customers have deducted TDS on the gross amount paid to the assessee, i.e., the service charges plus expenses in accordance with the circular issued by the CBDT. Hence there is a different between the amount shown in the Profit and Loss account (Operating income) and that shown in the TDS certificates. However, if the amount shown in the Profit and Loss account and the amount debited to "Expenses Recoverable account" are clubbed together, there is actually no difference. He submitted that the assessee has also reconciled the same by filing a statement before the Ld CIT(A) and the assessing officer has also exa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rial evidence could with due diligence have been discovered by the Assessing Officer will not necessarily amount to disclosure within the meaning of the foregoing proviso." In the instant case, the assessee has accounted for the reimbursable expenses incurred by it under the head "Expenses recoverable Account", but the said accounting practice was not examined by the AO during the course of original assessment proceedings. The Ld A.R submitted before us that the assessee had fully accounted all the receipts shown in the TDS certificates in the TDS certificates and hence the reason entertained by the assessing officer was not correct. He further submitted that the Ld CIT(A) has also accepted the above said fact. 7.1 However, it is a settle....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....so submitted that the Ld CIT(A) has properly understood the same and accordingly held that the assessee has accounted for all the receipts. The Ld A.R also submitted that the Ld CIT(A) has called for a remand report from the assessing officer. In the remand report, the assessing officer has only expressed his reservations like possibility of leakage, possibility of inflating expenses etc., without bringing any material on record. Accordingly, the Ld A.R submitted that the Ld CIT(A) has deleted the disallowances after analyzing all the facts relating to the addition made by the AO. 8.1 However, the Ld D.R submitted that the assessee has given only oral explanations without producing the relevant materials to substantiate its claim. The Ld D....