Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (2) TMI 616

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....de by BILAL NAZKI J.--A short point is involved in this writ petition. Counter has been filed and we have heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner claims to be dealing with empty gelatin capsules, which according to him are purchased from manufacturers outside the State. Thereafter, they are sold to the local manufacturers of drugs. The petitioner is an assessee of sales tax. For t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... would attract only four per cent tax. Consequential to the appellate authority's order, the assessing authority made the final assessment order charging tax at four per cent. For the year 1999-2000, the assessing authority finalised the assessment levying tax at four per cent. The respondent, however, issued a notice proposing revision of the assessment order on the ground that the empty cap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vied tax at 12 per cent under entry 37 of the First Schedule to the Act. He came to the conclusion that the empty capsules would not attract entry 19(iv) of the First Schedule to the Act. The case of the petitioner is that for two years, one year being subsequent and one year being prior to the disputed year, the department agreed with the assessee that the empty capsules would attract tax at four....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... one stand for a particular year and another stand for another year with respect to the same commodity. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has drawn our attention to a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Radhasoami Satsang v. Commissioner of Income-Tax [1992] 193 ITR 321. Almost a similar question was before the Supreme Court. In this judgment, it was held by the Supreme Court ....