Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (2) TMI 613

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of both, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. Writ petition is to call for the records on the files of the respondent herein in his Form No. I Distraint Order TNGST No. 2460012/1993-94 to 1996-97 dated January 12, 2006 and to quash the same. The facts of the case are as follows:   The petitioner is a registered ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion scheme for its revival. The liability determined by the respondent relating to the assessment years CST 1995-96, CST 1996-97, TNGST 1996-97 and TNGST 1993-94 were included and it was pointed out that challenging the liability, appeals were pending before the statutory authorities. Thereafter, the Commercia Tax Officer of the respondent herein also participated in the enquiry by the BIFR rep....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... operation of the order of the BIFR dated June 30, 2004 in case No. 242 of 1998 was stayed and the said appeal before the AAIFR is still pending. In the meantime, the respondent has served a notice in form No. I Distraint order by which a proposal has been taken for auction of properties of the petitioner-company. The petitioner's counsel submits that such recovery proceedings are totally a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titioner.   The honourable Supreme Court of India in a judgment reported in Tata Davy Ltd. v. State of Orissa reported in [1998] 111 STC 462, has held that arrears of taxes and the like due from sick industrial companies that satisfy the conditions set out in section 22(1) of 1985 Act, cannot be recovered by coercive process unless the Board gives its consent thereto. The said judgment ....