Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (3) TMI 351

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n CENVAT Credit availed on MS angle, MS beam, etc. has been claimed by the appellant as capital goods, which were used for foundation/structure of the machine/equipment, was denied by the lower authorities on the premise that as these items were used in erection of supporting structure, which are embedded to earth, therefore, they are not entitled to take credit. 2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) ELT 465 (SC) the appellants are not entitled to take credit and in the light of the decision of Vandana Global (supra), extended period of limitation is invocable. 5. Heard both sides. Considered the submissions on merits. 6. In the light of the decision of Vandana Global (supra) the appellant have no case. But on limitation, they are having a case in spite of the decision of ITC Ltd. (supra).....