TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2005 (1) TMI 649
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (since repealed) called "the Act" henceforth at the instance of State (Commissioner of Sales Tax) by the Board of Revenue in Reference Case No. 7-2/5/74/94 dated March 26, 1998 which arise out of an appellate order dated May 18, 1994 passed by Board in appeal No. 99 PBR/91 to answer the following question of law by this Court: "Whether under the facts and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er: "Wire rods and wires--rolled, drawn, galvanised, aluminised, tinned or coated such as by copper." 5.. This question was eventually decided by the Board of Revenue in favour of respondent/assessee/dealer in the case of this very assessee in a case reported in Vora Wires, Indore v. Commissioner of Sales Tax (1992) 14 Cur T.J. 294 on January 14, 1992. This is what the learned Members held in pa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the wire. The wires are not welded together; they can be unleashed to their original position of single wires. Therefore, stay wire would really be rolled wire which is nothing but wire as classified under section 14(iv) of the Central Act. The contention of the learned C.A. for the appellant must, therefore, be accepted." 6.. Relying upon the said view, the Board in the case for subsequent peri....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t is distinguishable. In that case, the question was, whether dressed hides and skins are different commodities from that of raw hides and skins. Their Lordship held that they are. In this case, such question is not involved. That apart, some of the observations sought to be relied on by the learned counsel for the State from this decision cannot be of any help to answer the question involved in ....