2014 (2) TMI 723

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r (AR) For the Respondents : Shri Mayur Shroff And Shri S N Kantawala, Advs. PER : Ashok Jindal The Revenue is in appeals against the impugned order wherein input credit on capital goods was allowed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals). The respondents have also filed Cross Objections against the revenue's appeals. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondents are manufacturers ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....grieved by the said order, the Revenue is before me. 3. The learned A.R. appearing on behalf of the Revenue submits that these tools and tips are not capital goods as they have not been used in the factory of the respondent and these tools and tips were not received in their factory "as such" after jobwork therefore, the respondents are not entitled to take credit of the same. The respondents h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... capital goods cannot be sent to the job-worker. Therefore, the capital goods used in the factory of the job-worker are entitled for credit to the respondent. Although the capital goods could not be returned "as such" after the usage, in that circumstances also the credit cannot be denied. Further, there is no bar on the respondent to take away 50% of the CENVAT credit in the year of procurement o....