2014 (1) TMI 1135

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cts and in the circumstances of the case and in the law The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, Mumbai ought to have given one more opportunity to produce the details, documents for scrutiny assessment. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in the law The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, Mumbai erred in upholding the addition made by Assessing officer amounting to Rs. 11,64,511/- on depreciation. The Appellant prays that disallowance made in respect of depreciation be deleted. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in the law The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, Mumbai erred in upholding the addition made by Assessing officer amounting to Rs. 60,25,114/- towards interest expenditur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nal evidences at the appellate stage. 2. The appellant prays that your honours hold that there was a reasonable and sufficient cause on account of which the appellant could not furnish the relevant details and evidences before the Assessing Officer and that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ought to admit the additional evidences, called for a remand report and decided the appeal as per law. 3. At the outset, the learned Counsel submitted that in the present case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has refused to admit the additional evidences, which were filed before him that goes to the very root of the issues involved. He has rejected the said admission of additional evidences on the grounds that there is no reasonable cause for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ional evidence. Thus, the findings of the Assessing Officer has to be sustained as the assessee has lost various opportunities given by the A.O. at the assessment stage. 5. We have heard the rival contention, perused the relevant findings of the authorities below and the material available on record. The Assessing Officer has completed the assessment at an income of Rs. 47,54,663, as against returned loss of (-) Rs. 34,84,478. The Assessing Officer, in Para-2 of the assessment order, has mentioned that various notices have been issued to the assessee, which has not been responded by the assessee. Accordingly, he has completed the assessment, based on whatever details, which could be furnished at the time of the assessment by the assessee. ....