2014 (1) TMI 734
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r Justice G. Raghuram: The Adjudicating Authority disallowed cenvat credit of Rs. 23,11,160-00 under rule 14 r/w proviso to Sec. 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act), appropriated Rs. 5,48,458-00 already deposited by the petitioner/appellant and set out a demand for the balance Rs. 17,62,702-00. The Commissioner (appeals) upheld the adjudicating order and dismissed the petitioner's app....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gs suffice it to note that in our considered view the petitioner/appellant is seen to have an arguable case in the substantive appeal. 3. We therefore consider it appropriate to grant waiver of the pre-deposit for preferring the appeal, on condition that the petitioner deposits 50% of the duty as assessed in the Order in Original and as confirmed in appeal (after taking credit for the amount al....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI